Program Description
Lung health, the development of lung disease, and how well a person with lung disease is able to live all depend on a wide range of societal factors. These systemic factors that adversely affect people and cause injustice can be thought of as “structural violence.”
To make the causal processes relating to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) more apparent, and the responsibility to interrupt or alleviate them clearer, we have developed a taxonomy to describe this. It contains five domains:
- Avoidable lung harms (processes impacting lung development, processes that disadvantage lung health in particular groups across the life course),
- Diagnostic delay (healthcare factors; norms and attitudes that mean COPD is not diagnosed in a timely way, denying people with COPD effective treatment),
- Inadequate COPD care (ways in which the provision of care for people with COPD falls short of what is needed to ensure they are able to enjoy the best possible health, considered as healthcare resource allocation and norms and attitudes influencing clinical practice),
- Low status of COPD (ways COPD as a condition and people with COPD are held in less regard and considered less of a priority than other comparable health problems),
- Lack of support (factors that make living with COPD more difficult than it should be, i.e., socioenvironmental factors and factors that promote social isolation).
This model has relevance for policymakers, healthcare professionals, and the public as an educational resource to change clinical practices and priorities and stimulate advocacy and activism with the goal of the elimination of COPD.
Target Audience
Pulmonologists, critical care specialists, translational researchers, and clinicians
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this activity, learners should be able to:
- Explain the concept of structural violence as it applies to lung disease, in particular chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Categorize the key domains of structural violence related to COPD
- Identify the different ways that healthcare professionals can address structural violence contributing to COPD
Course summary
1.00 Participation
1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit
Credit Expires: April 15, 2026
Format: Journal
This section is not in use.
Please visit the Accreditation tab to view Accreditation and Disclosure information.
ACCREDITATION STATEMENT
The American Thoracic Society is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
| Credit Type | Credit/Points | Credit Designation Statement |
| AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ | 1.00 | The American Thoracic Society designates this Journal for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. |
DISCLOSURE DECLARATIONS
The current practice of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (AJRCCM) is to publish high quality, peer-reviewed and evidence-based original research, Concise Clinical Reviews, Guidelines and Consensus Statements. Articles published in AJRCCM include evidence-based summaries of optimal practice (Concise Clinical Reviews), evidence-based guidelines, workshop summaries and original contributions that will influence clinical practice. The publication of these articles by itself is only one piece of a multi-step process for the translation of evidence-based improvements in care to clinical practice. Articles selected for CME credit are designed to be the next step in the process of translating clinically relevant, evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice. This will be accomplished through a series of questions specifically designed by the author(s) to test that readers have the tools needed to translate recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic clinical care into clinical practice. Members of the AJRCCM editorial board will review these questions and assess the quality of the questions based on:
- Clarity,
- Educational content, and
- The quality of the evidence supporting the response to the question. Posttest questions will assess if practitioners have understood the most important recommendations available for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary diseases, critical illness, and sleep disorders and are able to implement them into clinical practice.
Article Authorship Disclosures (as submitted to the ATS prior to article publication date)
Parris J. Williams, M.Sc. (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) reported no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Sara C. Buttery, B.Sc. (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) reported no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Anthony A. Laverty, Ph.D. (Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) is a Trustee of Action on Smoking and Health.
Nicholas S. Hopkinson, M.D., Ph.D. (Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom) is Chair of Action on Smoking and Health and Medical Director of Asthma + Lung UK.
Disclosures of AJRCCM CME Planners
The current practice of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (AJRCCM) is to publish high quality, peer-reviewed and evidence-based original research, Concise Clinical Reviews, Guidelines and Consensus Statements. Articles published in AJRCCM include evidence-based summaries of optimal practice (Concise Clinical Reviews), evidence-based guidelines, workshop summaries and original contributions that will influence clinical practice. The publication of these articles by itself is only one piece of a multi-step process for the translation of evidence-based improvements in care to clinical practice. Articles selected for CME credit are designed to be the next step in the process of translating clinically relevant, evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice. This will be accomplished through a series of questions specifically designed by the author(s) to test that readers have the tools needed to translate recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic clinical care into clinical practice. Members of the AJRCCM editorial board will review these questions and assess the quality of the questions based on (1) clarity, (2) educational content, and (3) the quality of the evidence supporting the response to the question. Posttest questions will assess if practitioners have understood the most important recommendations available for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary diseases, critical illness, and sleep disorders and are able to implement them into clinical practice.
Off-Label Usage Disclosure
None
AJRCCM CME Planners
Edward Schenck, M.D.
Associate Editor, AJRCCM
Dr. Schenck reported that he is a consultant for Axle Informatics
INSTRUCTIONS TO RECEIVE CREDIT
To receive credit for this journal article:
- Read the journal article. Keep track of how long it takes you to read it.
- Once you open the article, the Post-Test becomes available. After reading the article, answer the post-test questions. You must answer all questions correctly to earn credit. You may take the test as many times as you like.
- Once you pass the Post-Test, the Evaluation becomes available. Answer all the evaluation questions.
- Once you complete the evaluation, select the amount of credit to receive based on the time it took you to read the article.
- You can view, save and print your Certificate by pressing the Certificate button.
- To review the credits you've earned in this system and reprint certificates, go to the My Learning drop-down list. Then select Transcript.